This paper was very difficult to
comprehend or fully understand. I caught myself re-reading just the first few
sentences. I tried breaking down each sentence. What I understood from the
first couple sentences was even with a well-constructed union there is bound to
have a breakdown point however they (meaning congress or the union) should be
able to control the breakdown. Basically be able to control the system. "The
instability, injustice, and confusion introduced into the public councils,
have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular governments have
everywhere perished" this basically is saying that the government is
unstable and has failed. Another phrase that caught my attention was, “that
measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the
rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and
overbearing majority." This I can somewhat agree to an extent. Yes some
decisions are made for the people but superior people have the power to make
decisions they want and since they have that power they take control.
The
second part talks about removing mischief of faction. I think its talking
about the mischief of the government. It states we remove the causes and we
need to control the effects. If that were the case I think the government may
run smoothly. But of course it isn't that simple to do. (Which was stated in
bold in the article) we cannot fully remove the causes so we need to look at
the effects and somehow resolve them. It also talks about how the factions have
different opinions about religion, government and other points have divided mankind
into parties. That makes perfect sense because we have two different parties
that society fall into; Democratic & Republican. Both believe the
government system should run in a certain way. I see it as many “influences"
do have an impact on factions. Factions have a big part in dealing with the
government system. They have deal with what you think is right versus what others
believe is right and some how compromise with themselves and need to decide whats best.
I did not I fully understand the
federalist papers. I tried to break it down but it was very difficult and
puzzling to translate or wrap my mind around it. I hope I wasn't completely
off. But it would sure help if we went over it in class.
No comments:
Post a Comment